December 22, 2023
By Helmuth Eggeling
For those of us living in the northern hemisphere, it’s time once again to review system knowledge and procedures as they relate to anti- and deicing equipment before we embark on the next flight in IMC.
Equally important is to brush up on the nature and characteristics of icing as well as reacquainting ourselves with the regulatory aspects of flying in icing conditions. For example: Is the airplane certified for flying in known icing? What constitutes known icing? What equipment must be working before entering known icing conditions?
The following are some additional tips regarding the TPE331 when operating in icing conditions. For any issues regarding airframe icing and the effects of snow, ice, and cold air temperatures, etc. that have not been addressed in this article, please refer to your Aviation Weather Handbook and the appropriate Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM) for a more complete description of operating in icing conditions.
First, a few words to the wise:
Avoidance is the best method of coping with ice.
Certification for flight into icing conditions only ensures that the airplane is capable of safe flight through a limited range of icing conditions.
Prolonged operations in icing conditions should always be avoided, regardless of severity/type of icing and/or available anti-/deicing equipment.
Severe icing (e.g. freezing drizzle or rain) is considered outside of the FAA certification requirements.
Procedures and limitations published in the specific AFM or Pilot Operating Handbook (POH) take precedence over tips suggested in this article.
Now let’s discuss a few TPE engine operational topics with regards to icing conditions.
NOTE: An incident occurred several years ago in a northern U.S. area, in which a preflight inspection revealed that ice had formed in both engine inlets. The crew decided to turn the propellers through by hand until the impellers could be freed.
Although unusual resistance was met, the propellers were pulled by force until the impellers broke free. After start, engine whine was so loud that the tower called, asking if there was a problem. The engines were shut down, and a visual inspection determined that both impellers were bent to the extent that both engines had to be disassembled and the impellers replaced.
NOTE: Removing and re-installing batteries may constitute a maintenance action and could, therefore, require an entry in the logbook and a sign off by a certificated and/or licensed mechanic.
Noting indicated battery voltage at start initiation can provide an excellent early indication of potential starting performance problems. An excessive droop in indicated voltage (typically accompanied by very slow engine acceleration) means a suitably rated ground power unit should be used.
NOTE: During Inlet Heat ground checks, failure of the EGT (ITT) to rise could mean that the anti-ice valve did not open, or it could mean that the valve had been stuck in the open position prior to selecting engine anti-ice to ON. Therefore, if the proper operation of the engine anti-ice valve cannot be verified, flights into potential or known icing conditions must be delayed until the discrepancy has been corrected. See Honeywell Operating Information OI331-15, dated April 30, 1997.
NOTE: LACK OF RESPONSE TO THE POWER LEVER. The cause may be ice blockage of the P2 inlet sensor probe and can occur even when visible moisture is not present. If lack of response is observed, it is recommended that ignition and engine anti-ice be turned ON for both engines. This will introduce anti-icing air to the sensors (as well as the engine inlet) and normal response should return within approximately 3 minutes. Refer to OI331-13, dated April 27, 1995.
If the use of engine anti-ice is delayed inadvertently until after encountering icing conditions, it must be assumed that ice has accumulated in the engine inlet throat area. In such instances subsequent application of engine anti-ice heat can cause ice shedding and ice ingestion, which may cause a brief airflow interruption through the engine and could result in an engine flameout. Therefore, if ice has formed, the first action prior to de-icing is to manually select continuous ignition [IGNITION LH & RH to CONT] for both engines. Then switch the engine inlet heat [ANTI-ICE > ENG INTAKE L & R] one engine at a time to reduce the risk of a double flameout.
Reportedly, several flameouts have occurred following descent out of icing conditions into warmer air. Remember also, that under some conditions, ice accumulation can be difficult to detect visually.
For more information on the proper use of engine inlet anti-icing and the engine ignition systems (duty cycle limitations, etc.) please review the Honeywell Operating Information Letter OI331-11R7, September 18, 2009
In conclusion, the above tips are intended to be supplemental to the published operating procedures. For a complete study on aircraft operations in cold and in icing conditions, refer to the FAA/CAA approved procedures and recommendations in the appropriate PILOTS OPERATING MANUAL, SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION, COLD WEATHER OPERATION and NORMAL PROCEDURES. You can also visit a free online course at: https://aircrafticing.grc.nasa.gov/.
Helmuth Eggeling previously served as Honeywell’s Pilot Advisor for TFE731 and TPE331 engines.